Exchange distance of basis pairs in split matroids

The basis exchange axiom has been a driving force in the development of matroid theory. However, the axiom gives only a local characterization of the relation of bases, which is a major stumbling block to further progress, and providing a global understanding of the structure of matroid bases is a fundamental goal in matroid optimization. While studying the structure of symmetric exchanges, Gabow proposed the problem that any pair of bases admits a sequence of symmetric exchanges. A different extension of the exchange axiom was proposed by White, who investigated the equivalence of compatible basis sequences. Farber studied the structure of basis pairs, and conjectured that the basis pair graph of any matroid is connected. These conjectures suggest that the family of bases of a matroid possesses much stronger structural properties than we are aware of. In the present paper, we study the distance of basis pairs of a matroid in terms of symmetric exchanges. In particular, we give an upper bound on the minimum number of exchanges needed to transform a basis pair into another for split matroids, a class that was motivated by the study of matroid polytopes from a tropical geometry point of view. As a corollary, we verify the above mentioned long-standing conjectures for this large class. Being a subclass of split matroids, our result settles the conjectures for paving matroids as well.Comment: 17 page

Complexity of packing common bases in matroids

One of the most intriguing unsolved questions of matroid optimization is the characterization of the existence of $k$ disjoint common bases of two matroids. The significance of the problem is well-illustrated by the long list of conjectures that can be formulated as special cases, such as Woodall's conjecture on packing disjoint dijoins in a directed graph, or Rota's beautiful conjecture on rearrangements of bases. In the present paper we prove that the problem is difficult under the rank oracle model, i.e., we show that there is no algorithm which decides if the common ground set of two matroids can be partitioned into $k$ common bases by using a polynomial number of independence queries. Our complexity result holds even for the very special case when $k=2$. Through a series of reductions, we also show that the abstract problem of packing common bases in two matroids includes the NAE-SAT problem and the Perfect Even Factor problem in directed graphs. These results in turn imply that the problem is not only difficult in the independence oracle model but also includes NP-complete special cases already when $k=2$, one of the matroids is a partition matroid, while the other matroid is linear and is given by an explicit representation.Comment: 14 pages, 9 figure

Regular graphs are antimagic

An undirected simple graph G = (V,E) is called antimagic if there exists an injective function f: E → {1,…|E|} such that (formula presented) for any pair of different nodes u, v ∈ V. In this note we prove - with a slight modification of an argument of Cranston et al. - that k-regular graphs are antimagic for k ≥ 2. © 2015, Australian National University. All rights reserved

Algorithmic aspects of covering supermodular functions under matroid constraints

A common generalization of earlier results on arborescence packing and the covering of intersecting bi-set families was presented by the authors in [Bérczi, Király, Kobayashi, 2013]. The present paper investigates the algorithmic aspects of that result and gives a polynomial-time algorithm for the corresponding optimization problem